The overall medals ranking based on atomic weight of gold, silver and copper. This method seems to be the most balanced one. As a result of such calculation two silver medals are better than one gold, three bronze medals are slightly worse than one gold medal and two bronze medals better than one silver.
The atomic weight of gold, silver and copper respectively is 197.2, 107.88 and 63.57.


Friday, February 12, 2010

What is fair medal counting?


So how to count an overall result based on winning the medals? I have an idea! Why not to give 197 for the gold, 108 for the silver and 64 for the bronze(copper)? What are these numbers - you will probably ask. You can see it in the picture above. It is the atomic weight for Olympic metals based on periodic table. Isn't that fair enough?
The official Olympic medal table places the teams based on the number of gold medals won. If the number of gold medals is equal, silver medals will be counted etc. I don't think it is fair enough. There are teams that get many silver or bronze medals but placed quite low in table.

1 comment:

  1. Interesting idea, taking into account than atomic wait ratios Au/Ag~Ag/Cu~1.8

    ReplyDelete